MatrixLeaks: April 2012

Secret CIA Mind Control Experiments

1959, the Height of the Cold War. The Manchurian Candidate, a thriller novel written by Richard Condon, sends shivers across the nation as to the possibility of a secret U.S. Government mind control experiment program gone amok enters the mainstream. The story is about the son of a prominent political family who has been brainwashed into becoming an unwilling assassin for the Communist Party.

In the film, Major Bennett Marco, Sergeant Raymond Shaw and the rest of their platoon are captured during the Korean War in 1952 and are all brainwashed into believing Shaw saved their lives in combat. They go back home and Shaw gets the Medal of Honor. However, Marko begins to have a frequent nightmare in which Shaw kills two of his comrades. When he discovers that another platoon member has been having the same dream, he sets out to uncover the mystery about the nightmares.

What is happening to him is that he has become a sleeper agent.

The queen of diamonds in a deck of playing cards is the subconscious trigger, which compels him to follow their orders, which he doesn't remember afterwards. Making matters worse, Shaw is controlled by none other than his own domineering mother, who is working with the Communists in a plot to overthrow the government.

Could something like this happen?

How farfetched is a plot like this? This story, banned in communist countries, has long since fascinated conspiracy aficionados worldwide. After all, how much can we really trust big government, even our own? Could the U.S. Government do something like this to its own citizens? Hear the below evidence and make up your mind for yourself.

   An Introduction to CIA Mind Control Experiments

                                                                            Henry A. Murray.

For years, there has been speculation that the CIA has conducted numerous types of secret experiments on its own citizens. Some of these experiments included subjecting citizens to disease and testing the prolonged effects of LSD on some unwitting subjects.

Considerable evidence supports the contention that the so-called "Unabomber", none other than Theodore Kaczynski, participated in clandestine program called "MKULTRA". This CIA-sponsored battery of experiments was conducted at Harvard University under the direction of Henry A. Murray, at the time, a professor of Social Relations between 1959 and 1962.

Ted Kaczynski, the famous "Unabomber", motivated to kill by a CIA Experiment gone wrong? (Picture from Wikipedia)

According to Alston Chase of, Kaczynski was subjected to "a disturbing and what would now be seen as an ethically indefensible experiment on twenty-two undergraduates."

At the time, Alston asserts, Kaczynski was a "precocious, though impressionable, sixteen-year-old when he began his participation. His assigned code name was `Lawful.'" We all know the disturbing course of history Ted Kaczynski would soon follow. He emerged, years later, as a terrorist, sending mail bombs to academics. He has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Could his behavior have been a result of a failed mind control experiment? Could Kaczynski be a blowback?

What would happen if these allegations were true? Would our government do something so devious as to treat its very own citizens as lab mice or even worse? In addition, what would that say about the moral high ground our country has usually taken against other inhumane experimental regimes such as those conducted by the Nazis?

   CIA Mind Control Projects

It is hard to imagine what it was like growing up the son of a CIA researcher privy to some of the nation's darkest secrets and that is exactly the case with Eric Olson. The statement below dated August 8, 2002 and attributed to the Olson family living in Frederick Maryland today, can shed some light on what it would be like to be the son of a man the government may have felt knew too much. Eric Olson and his family for years now, continue to search for the truth regarding the mysterious death of their father, a prominent biological weapons researcher in the early 50s, who leapt to his death from a New York Hotel room. The statement asserts the following:

                                                                               Frank Olson

1. The death of Frank Olson (their father) on November 28, 1953 was a murder, not a suicide.

2. This is not an LSD drug-experiment story, as it was represented in 1975. This is a biological warfare story. Frank Olson did not die because he was an experimental guinea pig who experienced a "bad trip." He died because of concern that he would divulge information concerning a highly classified CIA interrogation program called "ARTICHOKE" in the early 1950's, and concerning the use of biological weapons by the United States in the Korean War.

3. The truth concerning the death of Frank Olson was concealed from the Olson family as well as from the public in 1953. In 1975, a cover story regarding Frank Olson's death was disseminated. At the same time, a renewed cover-up of the truth concerning this story was being carried out at the highest levels of government, including the White House. The new cover-up involved the participation of persons serving in the current Administration.

At the heart of the Olson cover-up, is the allegation that Frank, a United States Army biochemist and biological weapons researcher, was given LSD without his knowledge or consent in 1953 as part of a CIA experiment, thus leading him to committing suicide a week later following a severe psychotic episode. A CIA doctor assigned to monitor Olson's recovery claimed to be asleep in another bed in a New York City hotel room when Olson jumped through the window to fall ten stories to his death on the streets of New York below.

   MK Ultra and project Artichoke

One thing that has become clear: Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was indeed the code name for a for a CIA mind-control program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence. The program began in the early 1950s. According to most sources, it continued at least through the late 1960s.

Like MK Ultra, "Artichoke" was an offensive program of mind control. The program gathered the intelligence divisions of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and FBI. In addition, the scope of the project was outlined in a memo dated January 1952 that stated, "Can we get control of an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will and even against fundamental laws of nature, such as self preservation?"

                  The experiment on the effects of the LSD in U.S. Army was held in 1950 Edgewood

According to the web site,, declassified MKULTRA documents indicated hypnosis was a primary focus in the early 1950s. Additionally, experimental goals of the program included: "hypnotically induced anxieties." Other curiosities of this program included:

   ~  Hypnotically increasing ability to learn and recall complex written matter;

   ~  Studying hypnosis and polygraph examinations, hypnotically increasing ability to observe and recall   complex arrangements of physical objects; 

    - and -

   ~  Studying the relationship of personality susceptibility to hypnosis.

Furthermore, the site alleges there is much published evidence that the project involved the "surreptitious use of many types of drugs, as well as other methodology, to manipulate individual mental states and to alter brain function."

Project MK-ULTRA was first brought to wide public attention in 1975 by the U.S. Congress, in the form of the Church Committee, led by Senator Frank Church, and by a presidential commission known as the Rockefeller Commission. However, Investigative efforts were hampered by the fact that CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKULTRA files destroyed in 1973.

According to author John Marks in The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, the CIA insists that MKULTRA-type experiments have been abandoned. However, a 14-year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti has stated in various interviews that the CIA "routinely conducted disinformation campaigns and that CIA mind control research continued."

According to the site,, the CIA went to court prior to publication of this book, claiming that it would compromise national security. The court disagreed, but the publisher had to submit the manuscript to the CIA for prior review. The CIA asked for 339 deletions, most of which were refused by the court. Moreover, along with Philip Agee's "Inside the Company: CIA Diary," Marks' book is considered by some to be one of the most important works on the CIA in the 1970s.

                                                                                Ted Kennedy

Other evidence backing the veracity of such mind-control programs comes from Senator Ted Kennedy, no less. On the Senate floor in 1977, Senator Ted Kennedy said:

"The Deputy Director of the CIA revealed that over thirty universities and institutions were involved in an 'extensive testing and experimentation' program which included covert drug tests on unwitting citizens 'at all social levels, high and low, native Americans and foreign.' Several of these tests involved the administration of LSD to 'unwitting subjects in social situations.' At least one death, that of Dr. [Frank] Olson resulted from these activities. The Agency itself acknowledged that these tests made little scientific sense. The agents doing the monitoring were not qualified scientific observers."

   The Canadian Connection

The extent of MKULTRA gets even murkier. According to Marks, the experiments were exported to Canada when the CIA recruited Scottish physician Donald Ewen Cameron, creator of all sorts of outlandish experiments involving the mind.

Marks asserts Cameron had been hoping to correct schizophrenia by "erasing existing memories and completely rebuilding the psyche." Allegedly, this strange fellow commuted from Albany, New York to Montreal every week to work at the Allan Memorial Institute of McGill University. He was on the books for an annual salary of $69,000 from 1957 to 1964 to conduct MKULTRA experiments there.

                                                         Donald Ewen Cameron (born Gottlieb)

Supposedly, Cameron experimented with various paralytic drugs besides LSD as well as "electroconvulsive therapy at thirty to forty times the normal power."

According to Marks, his "driving" experiments consisted of putting subjects into drug-induced coma for weeks at a time (up to three months in one case) while playing tape loops of noise or simple repetitive statements.

Marks further alleges, Cameron's experiments were typically carried out on patients who had entered the institute for minor problems such as anxiety disorders and postpartum depression, many of whom suffered permanently from his actions. The results of Cameron's experiments were highly disturbing: incontinence, amnesia, forgetting how to talk, forgetting their parents, and thinking their interrogators were their parents.

The first quantity of LSD for experiments on humans to deliver pharmaceutical giant Sandoz.

Cameron's work was inspired and mirrored by the British psychiatrist Dr William Sargant at St Thomas' Hospital, London, and Belmont Hospital, Surrey, who also experimented extensively and very damagingly on his patients without their consent. According to Marks, Sargant was equally involved with the Intelligence Services.

It was during this era that Cameron became known worldwide as the first chairman of the World Psychiatric Association as well as president of the American and Canadian psychiatric associations. Perhaps ironically, Cameron had also been a member of the Nuremberg medical tribunal only a decade earlier. It is reasonable to ask if he learned a thing or two from the Nazis?

Immigration permits Dr. William Sargant, the father of infamous mind control techniques and experiments on humans

   Word Gets Out

So where is all the evidence today? Unfortunately, like anything involving allegations about the CIA, hard evidence is in short supply.

Allegedly, in 1973, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKULTRA files destroyed. It would follow logically then, most CIA documents concerning the project were destroyed, making a full investigation of MKULTRA all but a pipe dream.

                                                                             Richard Helms

The New York Times reported in 19741 that the CIA had conducted illegal domestic activities, including experiments on U.S. citizens, during the 1960s. That report sparked investigations by the U.S. Congress, in the form of a committee headed by Senator Frank Church, and by a presidential commission known as the Rockefeller Commission.

The congressional committee investigating the CIA research, chaired by Senator Frank Church, concluded that prior consent was obviously not obtained from any of the subjects.

The committee noted that the "experiments sponsored by these researchers ... call into question the decision by the agencies not to fix guidelines for experiments."

President Gerald Ford in 1976 issued the first Executive Order on Intelligence Activities which, among other things, prohibited "experimentation with drugs on human subjects, except with the informed consent, in writing and witnessed by a disinterested party, of each such human subject" and in accordance with the guidelines issued by the National Commission.


Yes, indeed something was afoul at the CIA during the height of the Cold War. MK-Ultra was unconscionable and the facts surrounding the death of Frank Olson remain clouded with suspicion all these years later.

The more frightening question is do these sorts of clandestine programs continue today? Could our Government still be trying to gain that extra advantage that would guarantee our global dominance for centuries to come? We only hope that the answer to that distributing question is no. We would like to believe we could trust Uncle Sam on this issue. We will put our faith in our hope that Uncle Sam has abandoned any interest in mind-control experimentation, but just in case, that tin foil hat will be in a place where we can easily get to it.


Marks, John (1979). The Search for the Manchurian Candidate.
New York: Times Books. ISBN 0-8129-0773-6.

Marchetti, Victor and Marks, John D. The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence.
New York: Dell Publishing, 1975. 397 pages.

"Book Disputes CIA Chief on Mind-Control Efforts", by Bill Richards.
The Washington Post, January 29, 1979, page A2.

"The CIA's Attempt At Mind Control: Bad Trips?",
The Washington Post, February 15, 1979, page C2.

"Canadians Sue U.S. Over CIA Tests of Behavior Modification Methods", by Laura A. Kiernan.
The Washington Post, December 12, 1980, page A44.

"Tests Contradict U.S. Story of Man's Suicide; Family Suspects CIA Killed Researcher"
by Brian Mooar. The Washington Post, July 12, 1994, page B1.

"New Study Yields Little on Death of Biochemist Drugged by CIA", by Brian Mooar.
The Washington Post, November 29, 1994, page B3.

"Mk Ultra", by Mark Jenkins.
The Washington Post, September 25, 1998, page N15.

The Frank Olson Project – a website created by Frank Olson's family
to explore the issues surrounding his death.

Declassified MKULTRA Documents at the Black Vault – the full 4-CD collection
of MKULTRA (and related) FOIA documents, online.

Declassified MKULTRA Project Documents

Print Page

Global Great Depression and Population Reduction

As tyranny continues its march out into the open, it is increasingly becoming cloaked in green. Under the guise of saving humanity, a chorus of recent announcements within elite circles, think-tanks, educational institutions, and the halls of science are calling for drastic measures to stop the planet's inevitable implosion from an overshot carrying capacity.

A U.N policy paper recently outlined  the building blocks for a world government that would enforce a "heavy-handed" approach toward humanity's impact on the environment, as this new epoch of  The Anthropocene Age  has begun to negatively alter the planet in irrevocable ways.

A rather infamous book, from a rather infamous group called The Club of Rome, is making a reappearance as humanity hurtles toward demise if its stewardship is not turned over to technocrats. Limits to Growth (1972) is nothing short of a blueprint for population reduction and neo-feudalism; or, as Yale economist Henry Wallich stated at the time of its release, its implementation means "consigning billions to poverty."

                                                  The book Limits to Growth, Club of Rome.

It appears that this plan has been green-lighted by the elite, as recent MIT research validates the conclusions drawn by Limits to Growth at this crucial time when we see the world economy imploding, and a jack-booted green police ready to hit the streets. According to MIT, we are headed toward a guaranteed planet-wide economic collapse and "precipitous population decline" if we do not heed the words of The Club of Rome.

Austerity riots and suicides are filling the streets throughout Europe, as draconian measures are being taken to curb runaway debt. This debt has provably been created by the Ponzi scheme of international banksters who have employed a loan-shark framework that is only paying dividends to those in position to buy up deliberately collapsed assets for pennies on the dollar.

The global elite continue to ignore that the problems which have been generated across the globe have very little to do with true resource shortages, unsustainable economies, or overpopulation; but rather the centralized control, mismanagement, and outright theft by corporate entities using globalization as a means of reducing sovereignty and self-determination.

                                               Africa,  photo is the property of Dees Illustration.

Resource-rich countries in places like Africa and those in the Middle East have long been targeted for plunder by colonialists and have never been rightly permitted to exist free of outside manipulation. This stratagem has now entered the West, where we are seeing Europe looted in similar fashion, and the resulting strife is used to divide and rule. It is the coordinated agenda of a network of think-tanks, NGOs, and international financiers well-versed in the methods of divide and conquer that form the real government of the world.

When one begins to piece together the scope of this deliberate looting, and the inevitable call for solutions from the very same players who should be held responsible, one might conclude that any of their calls for intervention based on humanitarian ideals should be judged a complete scam.

At or near the center of a web which has been woven using academia, top economists, mainstream media propaganda, climatologists, anthropologists, NGO's, think-tanks and human rights groups -- well meaning, and not-so well meaning -- is The Club of Rome.

First, it is important to understand the genesis of The Club of Rome and its philosophy, as it might demonstrate an inherent misanthropy that should make us skeptical of their calls for sustainability, true equality, or the betterment for individuals who comprise the human race.


The Club of Rome think-tank is likely to have been conceived in 1965 at David Rockefeller's estate in Bellagio, Italy at an international conference called "The Conditions of World Order." Twenty-one "scholars, writers, and scientists" met to discuss the role of "intellectuals" in the formation of a new world.

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, co-founder and co-founder of the group Bildeerberg Club of Rome.

It was their larger follow-up meeting of 75 people in Rome, 1968 when the group formally took the name The Club of Rome which has come to comprise the very top echelon within all fields relating to human development and politics.

Despite its trappings of being devoted to a better world for all mankind, it is overwhelmingly staffed by those born and bred from mega wealth, and those who have a stated worldview that is not compatible with many of the Club's purported goals.

This worldview was encapsulated in a follow-up book to Limits to Growth, called The First Global Revolution, which 21 years later laments and chastises the failure of wider humanity to aggressively implement the Club's previous suggestions, while openly touting manipulation as a way toward global unity.

There are many key passages in this book that give a clear indication of the mindset leading us through the present into the future, but a particularly striking section comes when they discuss the "limits of democracy:"

    Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything, and is unaware of its own limits.


    In its present form democracy is not well suited for the tasks ahead.


    We overlook (psychologically speaking, we deny) our ignorance and say we lack the political will. The crucial need is to revitalize democracy and give it a breadth of perspective that will enable it to cope with the evolving global situation. In other words, is this new world we find ourselves in governable? The answer is probably not with the existing structures and attitudes. (page 71-72, online edition)

         Kari Norgaard, a typical example of the new scholars who advocate the views of the Club of Rome.

This is an interesting statement in light of the one made by University of Oregon Professor, Kari Norgaard, who recently suggested  that those who believe that man-made climate change is a hoax should be treated as mentally defective racists. In a letter to Obama, she stated:

  'Policymakers should not wait for public opinion to take necessary action,' she writes, adding, 'Public opinion does matter in a democracy, but this is a time when following it would be a serious mistake.(Source)

And of course, "policymakers" are very often not even the democratically elected governments themselves, but international institutions and councils -- like the Club of Rome.

In order to justify such rapid movement taking place outside the framework of democracy, a threat so vast and so all-encompassing that mobilization against it must be swift and aggressive is to be sought. The Club of Rome sought it ... and they found it, by their own admission:

   The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we already have warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy is humanity itself. (page 75, online edition)


How is it that if these elite intellectuals truly care for the human race, we see the suppression of true alternative energy, the manipulation of climate science to achieve anti-human ends, and a centralization of power that has only lead to a runaway train of elite-induced death?

We are told of how vaccines will make us healthier when they kill and maim. Without our knowledge or oversight, GMOs have been introduced to combat food shortages, when they are leading to mass starvation, suicide, and horrible consequences for human health and the environment; all while self-sufficiency based on organic principles has shown to be the consistent solution that could actually feed the planet and establish sustainable economies. And, of course, we are told that fiat, debt-based currency will lead to global enrichment, when it only has led us to our current age of austerity.

The all-encompassing problem faced by humanity on a global scale is indeed real. However, the proven track records of those like the Club of Rome claiming the right to uplift humanity is dismal. In the foundational areas of human peace and prosperity -- economy, health, environment, science, law, politics, and philosophy -- these so-called elites have failed dramatically. Due to the length of time their misdirection has been in effect, it would be unwise to dismiss this as an extended series of miscalculations that approaches statistical impossibility. Rather, it must be concluded that it is by design. Once we draw that inevitable conclusion, their advice takes on new, much darker meaning; one that inspires us to say with confidence: the collective problem faced by humanity is collectivism itself, under the umbrella of a global administration with an agenda to deliberately collapse the economy and reduce the population.

As hard as it is to admit, the stated agenda by green global government for uplifting humanity cannot be the real goal -- for how can the destiny of humankind be uplifted through reduced living conditions and extermination?

We are at the crossroads now, as humanity faces the apocalypse brought about by nihilists and misanthropes. As the Club of Rome itself has stated:

   The acceleration of critical trends and cross-impacts among them indicates that the ‘window of opportunity’ for pulling out of the present global crisis and breaking through to a more peaceful and sustainable world is likely to be no more than four to five years from the end of 2008. This is close in time to the Mayan 2012 prophecy for the end of the current world. The period around the end of 2012 is likely to be a turbulent one for this and other reasons. Predictions coming from the physical sciences foresee disturbances in the geomagnetic, electromagnetic and related fields that embed the planet causing significant damage to telecommunications and impacting many aspects of human activity and health. For the esoteric traditions the end of 2012 will be the end of the known world, although the more optimistic interpretations speak of a new world taking the place of the old. (Source)

The time from 2012 until the threshold of 2030 is the time when humanity will face two divergent paths leading to this "new world:" The first possibility is massive decentralization away from harmful bureaucratic and autocratic rule that has caused economic booms and busts, industrial and corporate cronyism and abuse, and neo-feudal serfdom; the second is a path down which we are dragged kicking and screaming through the collapse point prophesied for 2030, ushered in by the technocracy self-fulfilling a world that it wants to be fully born in 2052. That world redefines what dystopia means for the average human subjected to its ultimately transhuman agenda.

Again, The Club of Rome describes the world of 2052 under its philosophy and esteemed leadership:

   ° Redefining the values which effectively guide the development of society

   ° Developing a new economy, both in theory and practice, so that

          ~  natural and social capital are correctly valued

          ~  new financial markets deliver the goods and services mankind needs in and for a sustainable world

          ~  sufficient jobs are created to allow a decent income for all

   ° Creating appropriate governance institutions on a global, national and local level

Its six goals to "shape" this future are:

   1.  Societal values, which are essential for a sustainable and equitable society, are fully reflected in all economic decisions.

   2.  The economies of the world reflect the value of natural and social capital, markets operate in a fair and transparent manner and deliver the goods and services required for a sustainable society.

   3.  A more equitable distribution of income both within and between countries.

   4.  Access to meaningful work, which provides enough income to lead a decent life, is guaranteed and recognized as an essential human right. Job generation has become a top priority for all investments, costs for unemployment are considered in decision-making.

   5.  Ecology is seen as a binding constraint for all forms of human activity and is therefore managed in a manner which reflects its biophysical and economic value. Never should the world be in overshoot.

   6.  Appropriate governance systems at a local, national and global level, which can manage the transition into an equitable and sustainable global world, are established. 

Even if some of these guidelines seem attractive on the surface, we must always return to who is directing the implementation. The systematic looting of individual wealth and production has been collectivized by the power elite with the intention of giving it back to humanity at a fraction of its initial worth -- this is their track record with such initiatives as Agenda 21, and the world we currently see as we look around. It is the playbook of every tyranny that has ever disgraced the planet.

When we admit to ourselves that what elites state as the world they wish to see, versus the world they are bound to create based on their actions, then we have to admit that the conclusions drawn by MIT in support of the Club of Rome are not those they plan to avoid, but something they desire to use to assert further control. And it will take place a lot faster with them and their like in charge of all decisions.

We really are about to witness The First Global Revolution, and it is rooted in information and ideas. Despite the challenges we face to alter our course from the one that has been chosen for us, there is one concept that we should take from their mission, for it represents the secret to all they have done so far:

       Change the Story -- Change the System   (Club of Rome)

Print Page

German-Swiss tax war

Looking for a tax evader, Germany has bought even Swiss bank illegal data. Now Swiss German tax investigators to bring to trial, as in Germany finds delight.

The conflict over German tax evader who deposited their capital in secret Swiss bank accounts has been going on for some time. According to estimates by the German financial administration of the accounts in Switzerland is around 180 billion euro that were never logged on German tax authorities. To get to the name of tax evader, the German government reached for the disputed funds. Thus, in 2010. German tax investigators participated in illegal purchase a CD with data over 1100 German tax evader with accounts at Swiss bank Credit Suisse.

   Economic espionage

The CD was then unnamed person paid 2.5 million but that amount, according to authorities, "has paid" when calling to order evader. But what the state paid now could backfire three German tax investigators. V. them, namely Switzerland this weekend and picked up an arrest warrant under the "reasonable suspicion" of a crime to assist in economic espionage and breach of bank secrecy. German government officials in Germany, though not imminent arrest, but they are currently "not recommended" crossing the Swiss-German border.

                                                              CD worth 2.5 million

The news of the raising of an arrest warrant in Germany sounded like a bomb. In particular, rose to his feet opposition Social Democratic and Green, which is considered scandalous behavior of Switzerland. "When  the dictators and mass murderers fleeing from their countries then they often refer their wealth in Switzerland. But Switzerland does not criminalize them than the German tax investigators," notes Joachim Poss, Vice President of Social Democratic caucus in the Bundestag. He was the federal finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble (Christian Democratic Union CDU) demanded that the German officers taken in defense rather than the behavior of the Swiss authorities described as a "legal".

   Investigators get a medal, not jail

The latest dispute will certainly ease the painstaking process of making the German-Swiss tax agreement. Opposition from the Democratic-Liberal government of Angela Merkel, is dependent upon the vote in the Bundesrat upper house of parliament, this agreement is already going too much into the hands of big capital and Switzerland. They believe that the agreement, which was to take effect early next year, in its current form protects the tax evader and the unjust towards those who honestly pay their taxes without the pressure of government.

                                                            Thomas Oppermann

Now the agreement is even farther away, because, as he announced the Social Democratic Minister of Finance of the Federal State of Baden-Wuerttemberg, N. Schmid, air between Switzerland and Germany "permanently deteriorated." Thomas Oppermann, a leading Social Democratic politicians in the Bundestag, is in conflict with the Swiss authorities went even further. He is a German tax investigators in Switzerland threatened with arrest for the proposed high German civilian honor, the Federal Cross of Merit. Improvement of the Swiss-German relations will contribute to the tax or the announcement of the federal finance minister of North Rhine-Westphalia, Norbert Walter-Borjans, who said that if he is given the opportunity to do so, and still buy CD with lists of tax evader. "Who deprive society of what legally belongs to the company commits an offense," says Walter Borjans.

Print Page
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...