Very bad news for the U.S., Britain and Israel
After the expected, but still great, the victory of Vladimir Putin, the Russian presidential election, many analysts are still trying to answer - what does this mean for Russia, but also for the world?
One thing is certain, the Western media, even before the election, tried in every possible way to diminish the legitimacy of Russian elections, Putin calling for fraud.
But the Russians to these threats, aimed at the incitement of demonstrations, answer the installation of a large surveillance systems, so that ultimately the Russian elections were one of the more transparent in the world in general.
Of course, it will not stop criticism - today announced the head of OCCE's (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), Croatian politician Tonino Picula, who said that the elections in Russia had "serious problems" as the main argument states that "no any real competition "and that" the government misused the resources to provide the ultimate winner." It also states that "procedures fallen during the counting votes says AP and Russia Today.
After the victory of Putin appeared before more than 100,000 Muscovites who lined the streets to celebrate his victory, in an emotional speech last night, among other things said: "This was not the only presidential victories, this was an important test for us all - test of political maturity and independence of our nation. we have shown us no one can impose anything, and we showed that our nation is able to recognize who is committed to progress and who has only one political objective - to destroy Russia. Today, the people showed how such a scenario is not possible in this country. Glory to Russia! "
The western media - a symbol of single-mindedness
Criticism of "competitiveness" are totally without foundation, thus directly disparage the attitude of the majority population of Russia. Today they are the media trying to explain that "give voice to the wrong man." On the other hand, Putin's big win - some are expecting to get "only" 50% of the vote - in fact a direct response, the majority of young people, to the fierce attacks from the west on their land and share "lessons" for whom to vote, against whom the protest etc.
Remember, this is not the first time that the Western media with its aggressive rhetoric directly created the counter-effect of their initial ideas - remember to Hungary late last year. On the streets of Budapest and elsewhere, many people joined the protests against the government of Viktor Orban, however, when the Western media - apparently caught "strategic opportunity" to bring down, not too fit Orban government, went into a giant smear campaign(CNN wrote of "disrupted and unstable democracy" in Hungary), the nation quickly turned around again and soon we had hundreds of thousands of people on the streets - but now in support of Orban and against the EU.
Of course, Hungarian and Russian example not too common, but both serve as a reference to the aggressive media campaigns are often counterproductive actual wishes of their editors.
Talk to RT: Adrian Salbuchi about Putin's victory - "a great thing for the entire free world"
As for the analysis of Putin's victory, the famous international consultant and author Adrian Salbuchi said in an interview with RT that this "brake against the neo-colonialist West."
"From the perspective of Latin America (author's note Salbuchi occurs from Argentina) can openly say that this is very bad news for the U.S., Britain and Israel. This is evident in the Western media, Putin gave the victory as" just a rumor "the explosion in the Congo and the railway accident in Poland. It was on CNN, BBC, Fox News, but it and the Deutsche Welle, RAI-Italian and Spanish media.
On the other hand, for example, from the perspective of Argentina, I can only congratulate President Putin, because this is good news for the whole world. Today, more than ever, when the strength of the movement towards global hegemony practiced by the United States, Britain, some countries of the EU and Israel - Russia is a key country, along with China, of course, but Russia is a key country, which must serve as a buffer zone, brakes, and even a wall against this neo-colonialism by the Western powers implemented. "
When asked the reporter, the West can expect from Putin, apparently because they worked a little easier with Medvedev, Salbuchi responds: "The only language you understand the world leaders, who are now cornered in Washington and London, the only real language to reach them when someone looks at them straight in the eye and tells them 'No, this will go. "I deeply believe that Mr. Putin is known to look the enemy straight in the eye without blinking."
On the issue, whether to change Russia after Putin became president again, Salbuchi states: "I think that Russia will continue to move towards a position which she rightfully belongs to each, and that is to be a global force - which is always and only a was a bit 'confused' during the 90's - and the world must create a balance, so to avoid being overrun by the whole world - I will only say the U.S., EU and Britain, because it would sound a bit childish, actually it is a global elite who fatten themselves within those countries. They must be stopped, I know very well how they operate ... you end up with the Middle East, will come here - in Latin America. Certainly it is one of the key reasons why, for example, Venezuelan state television followed in detail the Russian elections, while the Western media have virtually ignored the process. "
RT: "What will happen to the street protests, will disappear - now that Putin had won such a majority, or will grow under the influence of the opposition?"
Salbuchi: "In Argentina we know a lot about street protests, clearly - part of the opposition is really authentic and they are tired of constantly watching Putin, so for example 17% of the votes went Žuganovu, representative of the Communist Party. Saying this, it is significant that the most protesters in Russia, but throughout the world, run by a small number of very well trained, financed and trained provocateurs who do not care for the interests of the Russian people, or earlier Syrian and Libyan peoples, as we have seen recently, but only in the interest of major global geo -Western political forces that would really like to come to the chaos on the streets of Moscow and other Russian cities, based on the city plan, as built and based on the protests in Benghazi, Tripoli and now in Homs and Damascus. "
The last question - if the opposition failed because they lacked proper leaders who would do could hurt Putin's election, Salbuchi concludes: "There are two kinds of people - politicians and statesmen. What the world needs at this moment they are statesmen, think small. country .. you have given us a Adenauer, Churchill and de Gaulle, now give us a Merkel, Sarkozy and Cameron are really just low-ranking politicians. On the other hand, many people, especially people of Russia realize that Vladimir Putin and statesman I'm sure it will not go away so quickly. "
Video: Salbuchi: Putin a break against neo-colonial West
Comments