An increase of unresolved tensions with 9 / 11 Questions

Several controversial issues still plaguing the United States government and their version of the events of September 11, 2001. Who holds political power with the media elite would like to see the ongoing debates around the base unanswered 9 / 11 questions and differences disappear, despite mountains of evidence that suggest that citizens of the United States has said little much about the truth of the largest single day attack in the history of their homeland. Almost ten years after the events, there are still many unanswered questions: How did building 7 fall? What caused the destruction of the twin towers? Where is Osama Bin Laden? These are people who question the official version of 9 / 11 conspiracy theorists dangerous?

Academics and intellectuals who have tried to answer these questions have been ignored or derided by the company public (and even some left-liberal) media, policy experts and government officials who, apparently, to reduce to silence the so-called Movement for nine elevenths Truth, or anyone who questions the government's attitude on officially sanctioned. However, applications will not go away and begging for more answers.

Since spring 2010, more than 1,200 architects and engineers want a new investigation into the events of 9 / 11. These building professionals and academics are motivated by the fact that the 9 / 11 Commission Report was proven wrong on several accounts, scientific explanations have been flawed and inconsistent, and the American people deserve a much better explanation based on facts.

Meanwhile, new evidence of explosives that can be used in controlled demolitions was found in traces of dust from the World Trade Center (WTC) towers and Building 7 of the WTC complex. After careful consideration of the official story on 9 / 11 (where the Commission never even mention building 7), as well as forensic data are not included in official reports, these professionals have concluded that new independent and transparent investigation, these huge and mysterious structural failures is necessary.

Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth, said: "Officials of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) reports provide inadequate and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the destruction of "tricks." Gage, and other architects and engineers, has attacked reports that the first of these NIST NIST eventually change their conclusions, sent new evidence, and has published a new draft in 2008. Within thirty days after the project report was issued in 2008, NIST has taken the issues of public interest in this subject. Gage group sent a letter to a multitude inconsistencies and omissions in the 2008 report. However, the final report published in 2008, with almost any issue. The scientific method has not been observed in this study.

Gage and Architects & Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth has pushed the shares to recognize that the NIST Building 7, a skyscraper of forty-seven floors has not been hit by a plane, sent to the acceleration of free fall of over a hundred meters. An explanation of how and why he fell at a speed of free fall was not provided by NIST. NIST continues to say that watching the materials found at Ground Zero thermitic observed in the demolition theory "is not necessarily conclusive." Despite their claim that the evidence is not conclusive, dismantling, testing or had not decided to confront it at all, as if it could not and / or has not occurred (see Chapter 7 of this book, for details). Again, the scientific method has not been fully followed by government agencies.

In other 9 / 11 related issues, there is an ongoing mystery regarding the place of the alleged perpetrator, Osama bin Laden. Although bin Laden has taken credit for the incident (he, in fact, argued to the contrary, neither the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) who was a suspect in the crimes for lack of evidence) The government officials Both sides regularly make reference to bin Laden as responsible for 9 / 11 attacks.

In addition, Dr. David Ray Griffin, a former professor at Claremont School of Theology in California and author of several books on 9 / 11 numbers, suggesting that Osama bin Laden has been dead for almost nine years. He says that bin Laden died December 13, 2001, of kidney failure or renal failure related. There are recordings of bin Laden to be treated in an American hospital in Dubai for a urinary tract infection, often associated with kidney disease, and an order for a portable dialysis machine, which is essential for survival, which was sent to Afghanistan. Griffin, and he cites doctors said he would not bin Laden in a cave to survive in this car for a period of time. Griffin goes on to note that U.S. and British governments are aware of the death of bin Laden, and should continue to cover the war against terrorism. (See Griffin's book on the subject, Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive).

In other ongoing tensions on 9 / 11 on the home front, the President instructed Obama to direct the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), a law professor Cass Sunstein at Harvard, says the U.S. government should infiltrate and discredit the activist groups.

Sunstein call to discredit the group includes those who question the official account of 9 / 11 attacks, the so-called 9 / 11 'truthers'. Sunstein recognizes that the U.S. government was involved in conspiracies in the past, but he is confident that this is no longer a problem. (See Emergency truth of this volume, for more information on this subject, especially chapter 6.) Argues that groups that question the events of 9 / 11 is dangerous and may lead some people to violence (presented no concrete evidence to prove it).

Sunstein argues that refute these groups in public is not productive. He suggested that the most effective way to refute cogitatively is to infiltrate and discredit their internal sources. Sunstein is essentially calling for a return of the cons-intelligence program (COINTELPRO) since the Cold War, when government agents of the United States secretly infiltrated antiwar and civil rights groups in order to discredit and destroy them exciting activities planned violence or illegal acts themselves in order to bring groups on criminal charges.

Sunstein call to infiltration by groups of private citizens play a lot of concerns many activists 11.09 concerns they may be targeted or infiltrated, tried on some trumped up terrorist, criminal, and therefore can not obtain a just result.

Such a climate of fear and intimidation does not bode well for the first amendment rights, or for academic freedom in the United States, not to mention the chance to discover the truth about what really happened on on September 11.

   Update by Shawn Hamilton

More than a thousand architects and engineers have signed a petition to reconsider the destruction 9 / 11.

When I went to San Francisco to cover the Architects and Engineers for 9 / 11 Truth press conference (AE911Truth), I told the news service they are most closely related, I was afraid I'd say not to make history. This may not surprise anyone given the deafening silence of the media on 11/09 figures, but this is not an organ of the mainstream media, an alternative radio station was founded on principles that encourage press coverage has done little . To be honest, the news director said he could not cover the story and the story ran this weekend. The fact is that I felt compelled in this atmosphere of suspicion and fear surrounding media reception 9 / 11 subjects generally included in this station "progressive" in which people are clearly divided on the issue. I've never seen such strange circumstances surrounding the general media coverage of a problem except for the Kennedy assassination. In 1970, people laughed at those few people who suggested that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone, calling them "conspiracy nuts" and 9 / 11 activists are now labeled as "truthers", which sounds like " flat earth. " Some of these activists have adopted the tag "Truther" but I think you should refrain. The term is not intended as a compliment.

I asked a theologian David Ray Griffin, who spoke at the conference because he thought the media had acted so strangely towards the challenges 9 / 11. Griffin said that the "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theory" are manipulated to be journalists are afraid of losing their reputation and employment. "You know how it works. Everyone in the media knows how it works," he said. "No one overtly threatened, but only know the rules."

The press conference was a remarkable story whole group says is true. It's a good story because so many people question the official explanation of the tragedy of September 11, 2001. The fact that over one thousand licensed architects and engineers want a full investigation, which increases its relevance. If what you say is true, even partially, the consequences are serious, but in any case, there is a legitimate story. I do not expect the agency to approve the views of groups like AE911Truth, which is not their role. I expect them not to cover when they hear alarming words: ". 9 / 11 "Democracy is not served by journalists afraid to cover sensitive events.

Since summer 2010, AE911Truth (ae911truth.org) scored more than 1,200 construction professionals to sign his petition to Congress demanding a truly independent investigation, and a new group formed called the fire department at 9-11 Truth (firefightersfor911truth.org ) who question the official reports and public misperceptions of what happened on September 11. A group called New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (nyccan.org) tries to convince the New York City Council to investigate the unusual circumstances surrounding the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (ae911truth.org/index.php / news / -articles/286-nyccan-ae911truth-ask-ny-city-council.html 41). All the sites I mention here are links to some of the 9 / 11 sites most credible. AE911Truth link to the page is a good starting point. I will take questions relating to this site as well: examiner.com/x-36199-Conspiracy-Examiner. My email address is lesseroftwoevils@rocketmail.com.

  Update by Daniel Tencer

In May 2010, the New York Times Magazine published a complete profile of Cass Sunstein, the first point, which is found in traditional media, such as law professor, took over the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). the title of the article, "Cass Sunstein wants to nudge us" is an understatement, since the point of view, Sunstein has expressed over the years, but at least the track themes: that much of the doctrine of Sunstein has been focused on social control and government control over information.

Unsurprisingly, Sunstein treated article with gloves and largely neglected the most controversial elements of his ideas. It wore on him as a champion of the concept of "libertarian paternalism," a new flowering of the field study behavioral psychology mixtures with free market economy and suggests that people can be "pushed" making good choices (for example, the choices you want the government), not by laws and regulations, but to make the right choice "right" seem more psychologically attractive.

Write to the Huffington Post, Russ Baker criticized the New York Times to "bury" allegations of Sunstein thirty-five most controversial points of history, where we finally said he supported the "cognitive penetration" of groups of conspiracy theory. The Times says Sunstein also suggests that, as a government official, would not have made the most radical elements of his ideas, academic or experimental. But, as Baker points out, this remark was made in fall 2009-the first article of Sunstein on conspiracy theories came to light by the media. What appears in the Times Sunstein be backing his most controversial ideas is, in fact, none of this.

Cass Sunstein and understand its effect on government and society is complicated by two things. The first is that it is a political chimera, which has supporters and detractors on both sides of the political spectrum. Some conservative critics, populists came to meet him, while intellectuals seem to have thrown their weight behind him. Sunstein also Glenn Beck said to be "more powerful than the Fed," and will "watch your every move," the columnist George F. Will said that his ideas would lead to greater readability, smallest, and the government would have "the virtue of annoying those busybody, Liberal nanny state." In the United Kingdom, Sunstein works are "necessary for the conservative candidate," reports the Daily Telegraph.

The second element is that Sunstein, it is difficult to understand his position in government is primarily concerned with dry, bureaucratic problems that can not capture the imagination of one of the mainstream press and alternative media. As head of OIRA, Sunstein is responsible for verifying all requirements of the new government. However, the extent of its decisions, those we know, were small and highly technical, such as his call to streamline the process of writing names and regulations so that people better access to them.

Sunstein, however, manage to anger environmentalists recently when he blocked a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation that lists coal ash as hazardous carcinogenic. Environmentalists have accused him of yielding to the coal, which does not see its coal ash disposal cost increase under the new rule.

So where Sunstein is headed? He probably groped the kinds of programs to control the information provided in the past? Even if it does, it is likely that the mainstream media will cover at least part of its efforts to push the political debate to a center of "acceptable". In a 2009 review of the New Yorker of his book on rumors, Sunstein has given credence to the prediction of the circumstances that led to the emergence of voice over the Internet as the alleged "birth" that Obama does is not born in the United States, and the "death" statement on the panel of health care reform. He was then cast as the hero of the fight against these trends. Given the existing case law, it is likely that any attempt Sunstein is to shape the content of public information will probably find a good hearing in the media of the old guard.

   Student Researchers: 
~  Mike Smith, Nolan Higdon, and Sy Cowie (Diablo Valley College) 
~  Mikey Hemkens, Ryan Huffman, and Colin Doran (DePauw University)
~  Greg Bernardi (Sonoma State University)

   Faculty Evaluators: 
~  Mickey Huff (Diablo Valley College)
~  Andrea Sununu and Kevin Howley (DePauw University)
~  Rick Luttmann and Peter Phillips (Sonoma State University)


   Sources:
PR News Wire, “1,000 Architects & Engineers Call for New 9/11 Investigation: Cite Evidence of Explosive Demolition at Three World Trade Center Towers,” February 19, 2009, , http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/1000-architects—engineers-call-for-new-911-investigation-84768402.html.
Shawn Hamilton, “Over 1,000 Architects and Engineers Have Signed Petition to Reinvestigate 9-11 Destruction,” Examiner.com, February 23, 2010, http://www.examiner.com/x-36199-Conspiracy-Examiner.
Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth, “1,000+ Architects & Engineers Officially Demand New 9/11 Investigation,” Infowars.com, January 18, 2010,  http://www.infowars.com/1000-architects-engineers-officially-demand-new-911-investigation.
Global Research, “1,000 Architects & Engineers Call for a Real 9/11 Investigation,” January 25, 2010,  http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17507.
Sue Reid, “Has Osama bin Laden Been Dead for Seven Years—And Are the US and Britain Covering It Up to Continue War on Terror?” Daily Mail (UK), September 1, 2009, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1212851/Has-Osama-Bin-Laden-dead-seven-years—U-S-Britain-covering-continue-war-terror.html.
Daniel Tencer, “Obama Staffer Wants ‘Cognitive Infiltration’ of 9/11 Conspiracy Groups,” RawStory, January 13, 2010, http://rawstory.com/2010/01/obama-staffer-infiltration-911-groups.